Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!news.moat.net!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr23.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!4cbf1d6f!not-for-mail From: "mathewsantifeminism" Newsgroups: fj.life.in-japan,soc.culture.french,soc.culture.german,soc.women,soc.men References: <1133429879.968575.19700@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1133442987.898230.199300@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1133451264.212138.306630@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1133474561.368865.244830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: IS the female orgasm a myth? Lines: 88 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.218.152.139 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr23.news.prodigy.net 1133484975 ST000 69.218.152.139 (Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:56:15 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:56:15 EST Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: OH]QBWKDPRRSW_MSX@CBNWX@RJ_XPDLMN@GZ_GYO^BSZUSAANVUEAE[YETZPIWWI[FCIZA^NBFXZ_D[BFNTCNVPDTNTKHWXKB@X^B_OCJLPZ@ET_O[G\XSG@E\G[ZKVLBL^CJINM@I_KVIOR\T_M_AW_M[_BWU_HFA_]@A_A^SGFAUDE_DFTMQPFWVW[QPJN Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:56:15 GMT Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:30599 wrote in message news:1133474561.368865.244830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > mathewsantifeminism wrote: >> "Hyerdahl" wrote in message >> news:1133451264.212138.306630@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> > >> > catbrier04@yahoo.com wrote: >> >> >TXZZ wrote: >> >> > Or did a team of german scientists discover it in the 1950's? >> >> >> >> Ooooo...honey...NO! I assure you, it is very real! >> > >> > Over and over again. :-) >> >> i'm sure in some ways you're a lovely person, but really - having seen >> some >> of the hateful biol that spills from you upon men, > > That's a lie. not when i wasn't replying to your post... making it quite truthful. > Denegrating stupid soc.mener's is NOT attacking men in > general. You cannot find a single post in which I have EVER attacked > men as a gender. Unlike your lot, I aim my barbs at stupid people, not > a whole gender. > I haven't accused you of attacking men as a gender - i did accuse the person who's post i was replying to of attacking men in general though. >> i don't believe any man >> would - or even could - want to get 'that close' to you to do so. > > You would be very wrong. LOL! not at all, unless you know that hyerliar 'that well' to know her sexlife? > >> Of course, you didn't state that it was a man who had made you orgasm >> 'over >> and over again'... > > People don't "give" each other orgasms. They cooperate in a joint > orgasmic venture. agreed, but wording technicalities aside - the points stands, as does yours. > >> Anyway, men too can have multiple orgasms - but it requires a special >> technique, and i don't know many females who've managed to learn that a >> man >> even has the capacity - let alone learn HOW to do it right. Thankfully, >> my >> wife does after a little training :) > > You would be very surprised what I know about men and their orgasms. i'm sure i would be - but i wasn't aiming at you in particular. I just know that the vast, vast majority of women who i've entered into discussion with regarding male orgasm are unaware that a man can have multiples - or 'dry'. An > antifemale lunatic once screamed at me (on-line) asking what I knew > about penises, since I didn't have one myself. > I simply asked him how many penises (other than his own) had he > personally handled? Curiously, he never responded. {smile} > good call. But as i said since the start of this reply - i wasn't replying to your post...so it isn't very relevent to this situation. but well done for shusshing someone. > Cat > -- http://antifeminism.mathews.me.uk http://antifeminism.forumup.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- it takes a man to tolerate feminism.