tm wrote:
> Brett Robson wrote:
>> Brett Robson wrote:
>>> tm wrote:
>>>> Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>> John W. wrote:
>>>>>> Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>>>> John W. wrote:
>>>>>>>> Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> John W. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> TXZZ wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think France has a lower crime rate than US because the
>>>>>>>>>>>> french keep stupid people like you (women) in their place
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> So who is stupid then?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Pay attention. He clearly said French Women were stupid.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> But they get better results (less crime) than the smarter US
>>>>>>>>> men. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Maybe he's saying that the women in France are not only stupid,
>>>>>>>> but also
>>>>>>>> a bunch of crazy criminals, and by putting them in their place
>>>>>>>> they can't possibly break any laws.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But the problem is Louise isn't French, is she?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think the problem is we are trying to find some sense in
>>>>>>> Matty's orginal post.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Oh. I thought we were making fun of him.
>>>>> 
>>>>> No, I was making fun of you. I thought you were making fun of
>>>>> louise. 
>>>> 
>>>> If I were to waste my time with a bread analogy i'd probably say
>>>> that i always pictured Ms Bremner as a spicy crouton and
>>>> superoutland as an overboiled pudding.
>>>> I'd call you guys a couple of crackers.
>>>> But then i'd never waste my time with such a stupid analogy.
>>>> 
>>> Good, there has been far too much stupidity on this thread so far.
>> 
>> damn,damn,damn I meant to write
>> Good, there has been far too much stupidity on this bread so far.
> 
> Wouldn't have gotten much of a rise out of me either way.

Those jokes are both pretty crummy.