Rick wrote:

> JJD wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:32:27 -0600, "Duke of URL"
>><macbenahATkdsiDOTnet> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>And they say the British Class structure is dead.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Who says that?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Foreigners, I would imagine. And poor people.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>A popular, but unsubstantiated myth - have no truck
>>>>>>>>>>>with it. That's my advice.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Trucks are too frightfully proletarian for this thread, Jeff.
>>>>>>>>>>Landaus, broughams and coupes de ville, those are the sorts
>>>>>>>>>>of transport for a pukka British chap.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>One has Jaguars.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Jaguars are too frightfully proletarian also, having been taken
>>>>>>>>over by the dreadful Ford chappie.  Best stick to Rolls Royce
>>>>>>>>or Bentley - oops, they're now German aren't they?  How about
>>>>>>>>Aston Martin and Lotus?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Had the Asters out to 130mph last week, but that was just on
>>>>>>>one's driveway, so it's not a true indication.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So it was you I passed in my 72 Crown Vic. I thought it was the
>>>>>>Geiko Lizard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Was I wearing a cravat and sporting a pipe?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I thought there was a law against driving one without the requsite
>>>>attire. Was it a tartan cravat or a yellow one?
>>>
>>>He's *nglish, therefore not allowed to wear anything but a regimental
>>>tie.
>>>
>>
>>A significant portion of that is quite erroneous.
>>
>>JJD
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


You've got him lost for words, JJD.
-- 
.sig space for rent