"USA" <USA@aol.com> wrote in message
news:7s0Ma.1979$GG2.1363@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Kay" <nospam@nos.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns93AA7F1D2F2AFnospamnoscom@207.225.159.6...
> > "USA" <USA@aol.com> wrote in
> > news:M1YLa.415$KJ4.39@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com:
> >
> > >
> > > "Kay" <nospam@nos.com> wrote in message
> > > news:Xns93A9AFCC68725nospamnoscom@207.225.159.7...
> > >> "min10011" <min10011@hotmail.com> wrote in
> > >> news:D8iHa.145708$h42.62127@twister.nyc.rr.com:
> > >>
> > >> > That is so true.  Matsuda's selective documentation is as specious
> > >> > as the ones that the PRC produces to declare that more than 30
> > >> > million Chinese died during the Japanese occupation.  He has
> > >> > conjured up a little fantasy that Japan had committed no wrong and
> > >> > indeed had noble intentions.  The idiotic likes of USA@aol.com buy
> > >> > into the fantasy until they hear that the attack on Pearl Harbor
> > >> > was a justified "pre-emptive" strike.
> > >>
> > > Oh I'm sorry Kay...I missed this one. You know, you keep attacking me
> > > posts all over the place
> > > including ones in which I am not a participant, so it's really hard to
> > > keep tabs on all the bad-mouthing
> > > of me that you are doing.
> > > I have NEVER said that Japan comitted no wrongs. Doesn't the fact that
> > > I have been arguing that
> > > the Japanese killed more Chinese people than Koreans PROVE that
> > > point???? Or do you, like grunt, believe that Chinese people are not
> > > worthy of being counted as people???
> > > And now that you bring it up, yes the Pearl Horbor attack was
> > > justified from te viewpoint of the
> > > Japanese, but not from our (AMerican) point of view.
> > > I suppose you are going to re-write/paraphrase this into something
> > > completely different now
> > > since that's what you do being the retarded monkey that you are.
> >
> > Dear, dear, dear USA, as usual, you are proving
> > you have reading impediment problem and barking
> > at a wrong tree.
> >
> > If you know how to read, you would notice that the
> > the post you are so mad about is by min10011, not
> > Kay.  Can you tell the difference between "kay" and
> > "min?"  "Kay" starts with a letter K; "min" starts
> > with "m."
> >
> > Do I expect an apology from you?  There is a "first
> > time" in everything.  (DWS)
> >
> > Or, will I get another truck-load of profanity for
> > telling you the truth?
> >
> You are right. I made an error. It was indeed min1011 who wrote:
> "The idiotic likes of USA@aol.com buy
> into the fantasy until they hear that the attack on Pearl Harbor
> was a justified "pre-emptive" strike."
> It was not you.
> I Apologize.
>

Actually...after reading this scarcastic part:
> > If you know how to read, you would notice that the
> > the post you are so mad about is by min10011, not
> > Kay.  Can you tell the difference between "kay" and
> > "min?"  "Kay" starts with a letter K; "min" starts
> > with "m."
Fuck you Kay.