Phlip wrote:

> So today, we have the exact same effect. Amateurs researching and
> speculating on the "controlled demolition" theory give the PNAC a perfect
> smokescreen. This disinformation (which has documented PNAC roots) makes
> genuine research into all the real coincidences and betrayals on 9/11 very
> easy to smear and discredit.
> 
        Exactly so!  Everything that is discussed lately is pretty much crap.  The
attacks of Sept 11, 2001 were clearly a false flag operation conducted to
give the U.S. an excuse to attack iraq.  There were no bombs in the
buildings to bring them down.  Why would they do that?  They would have
been much better off if the buildings hadn't come down.  They were huge
phallic symbols and all the wisdom of the time said that they would
withstand being crashed into by a jetliner, which they did for a while. 
They never thought about the heat weakening the steel.  Clearly they wanted
to stand up afterwards and say, "Those towers are still standing and
America will not be crushed by these attacks."  Instead they had to
scramble to re-write speeches no doubt and the economy in the U.S. took a
year and a half to recover.  They didn't plan that, but it happened.
        The CIA knows they're exposed and they mounted a huge disinformation
campaign to totally confuse the picture as much as possible.  To a
considerable extent, it's working, but lets not be confused.  In a world
where it's so hard to make money, Bush and his friends have banked billions
and billions of dollars from the war and that didn't just happen by
accident.  Hundreds of thousands of people have died and millions have
suffered for it, on all sides.


-- 
Regards,  Fred