in article 1118955806.189274.313130@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, John W. at
worthj1970@yahoo.com wrote on 6/17/05 6:03 AM:

> Ernest Schaal wrote:
>> in article d8s3no$nhd$1@caraway.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp, necoandjeff at
>> spam@schrepfer.com wrote on 6/16/05 11:52 PM:
>> 
>>> John W. wrote:
>>>> necoandjeff wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> A video statement is enough to open an investigation? I'm glad
>>>>> you'll never be a judge at U.S. probable cause hearings...
>>>>> 
>>>> For child molestation in the US, yes. People have had their kids taken
>>>> away and been investigated for far less.
>>> 
>>> But not a general statement in an interview that you share your bed with
>>> boys. How much you wanna bet that the judge needed more than just that video
>>> statement before he would sign the search warrant for Neverland Ranch?
>> 
>> Does that mean Gandhi should have been jailed for sleeping with young girls,
>> including his daughters?
> 
> Well, cultural issues aside I think everyone understands the difference
> between sleeping with your own kids and sleeping with others. But had
> Gandhi not been famous and had he been a poor man in America he
> probably would have had he gone around bragging about sleeping with
> other families' young girls.
> 
> I'm not condoning the often over zealousness of authorities, just
> saying it's there.
> 
> John W.

Well, according to at least one biography of the man, Gandhi slept with
other families' young girls too.