in article BD106AC1.1E43B%eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp, Ernest Schaal at
eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp wrote on 7/6/04 2:42 PM:

> in article 40EA3955.5090104@hotmail.com, Declan Murphy at
> declan_murphy@hotmail.com wrote on 7/6/04 2:32 PM:
> 
>> OR Ping Ernest & Raj, whatever.
>> 
>> Would it be possible to take your conversation to email?
> 
> Gee whiz, not have a chance to publicly ridicule and bring scorn on Raj?
> 
> I must admit that I enjoy pointing out the deficiencies in his arguments,
> but I realize that it isn't right to highjack the group for such activities,
> so I will desist from further responses to him in this thread (unless Raj
> does something that is REALLY extreme).

I just noticed that the thread of Mr. Murphy's message was different from
that where Raj and I were in disagreement. I will desist from further
responses to him in the thread "Attn: Ernest Schaal" (unless Raj does
something that is REALLY extreme).