in article capi7q$jvj$3@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/16/04 10:33 PM:

> Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
>> in article camtk1$i38$1@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/15/04 10:29 PM:
> 
>>> Kevin Wayne Williams <kww.nihongo@verizon.nut> wrote:
> 
>> [SNIP]
> 
>>>> Please define what you think tax cuts should be proportionate to.
>>> 
>>> That wouldn't be a "definition", so much as an "opinion", now, would
>>> it?
> 
>> Your sentence gives the false impression that there is only one thing that
>> "proportionate to" can be defined as.
> 
> Uh, no, my sentence gives the correct impression that if I am asked for
> "what (I) think tax cuts should be proportionate to", I would be giving
> an opinion. There is, in fact, an implication, that there may be more
> than one way to define this.
> 
> Sorry, but you're wrong again.
> 
> Mike