On 7/11/03 12:03, in article utntgv83g686aueqar3jdtd3i5q0lmujk4@4ax.com,
"Michael Cash" <mikecash@sunfield.ne.jp> wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:23:40 GMT, Jason Cormier <fjlij@hotmail.com>
> belched the alphabet and kept on going with:
> 
>> On 7/3/03 19:48, in article be2fd1$jd9o$1@ID-105084.news.dfncis.de, "Kevin
>> Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Jason Cormier wrote:
>>>> On 7/3/03 16:10, in article be22k4$f22b$1@ID-105084.news.dfncis.de,
>>>> "Kevin Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I suppose that Jason's statement is true
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I see that you are an avid reader of Maureen Dowd's column.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nope, I haven't read the Times in months.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Whoosh.
>>>> 
>>>> Kevin, I'm afraid that you are, once again, suffering from premature
>>>> Usenet ejaculation.
>>> 
>>> Why are you so interested in my ejaculation?
>> 
>> Only when it gets all over the NG. Get over yourself, lad.
> 
> So you see, Kevin, he is more interested in your ejaculate than your
> ejaculation.

The process is his alone; the results are there for all of us to see.