Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!onodera-news!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!peer2.news.opaltelecom.net!zen.net.uk!24.215.0.32.MISMATCH!newsfeed.mountaincable.net!cyclone01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com!news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309
Subject: Re: Ok, I was wrong about the Supreme Court
From: Jason Cormier <fjlij@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: fj.life.in-japan
Message-ID: <BB24EFA4.4ECB5%fjlij@hotmail.com>
References: <bdf175$shppc$1@ID-105084.news.dfncis.de> <bdl6bo$lk3$1@news.Stanford.EDU> <BB239F4E.4E825%fjlij@hotmail.com> <bdla0b$u4b2f$1@ID-105084.news.dfncis.de> <BB24E939.4EC98%fjlij@hotmail.com> <bdnsfk$ue7fp$1@ID-105084.news.dfncis.de>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:39:47 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.153.53.3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rogers.com
X-Trace: news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com 1056929987 24.153.53.3 (Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:39:47 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:39:47 EDT
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:1625

On 6/29/03 19:24, in article bdnsfk$ue7fp$1@ID-105084.news.dfncis.de, "Kevin
Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:

 
>>> I don't know about Canada, but in the US neither the SCOTUS nor any
>>> other organ of government grants rights. That having been said,
>>> first the Court would have to find that there is a right to marry.
>> 
>> I betcha some of the guys I know would think yer kinda cute when you
>> lecture, Kevin.
> 
> Hell, I'm cute in fluorescent lighting on the first day of my period.
> 
>> Wanna meet one at Toronto City Hall? Wear a suit,
>> bring your birth certificate, and cash or credit card. I'll show you
>> the new Canada.
> 
> Of that I have no doubt.

So tell me, Kevin: How do you feel about gay marriage? Forget the issue of
the courts and their intrusion upon the areas of legislative authority and
other such constitutional/procedural issues. How do you fell about marriage
no longer being prohibited for homosexuals in most of Canada? How about the
same across the US?
 
>> (The little  woman shouldn't be a
>> problem....according to the neo-con whining, legalised bigamy is only
>> days away.)
> 
> I don't know what a neo-con is, so I am afraid I am unfamiliar with their
> whining.

It's a term that's become popular in describing the new generation of
Canada's conservative politicians, political parties, and those that support
them.