Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!gcd.org!news.yamada.gr.jp!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: eurms@apionet.or.jp (M_SHIRAISHI) Newsgroups: fj.sci.lang.english,fj.jokes Subject: Re: " ANYTHING WILL DO ! " by Akko MOMONOKI Date: 7 Feb 2004 07:53:21 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 57 Message-ID: <800c7853.0402070753.53dcc709@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.230.228.45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1076169202 26791 127.0.0.1 (7 Feb 2004 15:53:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 15:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.lang.english:84 fj.jokes:10564 桃の木あっこ wrote in message news:... > "shuji matsuda" wrote in message > news:br79ar$49ci$1@ID-37799.news.uni-berlin.de... > > In article , > > v（^-^）v〜♪♭ wrote: > > > "good or wrong" is better than "right or wrong" > > > > と言っておきながら、次は > > > > "right or bad" と"good or wrong" > > > > の話をbecauseで結ぶ所。論理が一貫できないのでしょうか？ > > > > : IT'S A SENSE ! > > > > なるほどねえ。 > > > Yes !　Yes !　Yes !　Yes ! > > " IT'S A SENSE ! " > > Your NARROW SENSE consists in where you think or consider with the > EXTERNAL GIVEN MEANING (in Japanese) and but with the INTERNAL > FROM -THE - FIRST MEANING (in nature). Shortly this is the proof that > aufully you lack ability to think or consider . And now the SILLY AND > STUPID THINGS have been told by you shamelessly. > > I'm afraid the following confession by me is too late by now. The fact is > this. "Right to wrong and good to bad " are known to everybody already > at least as a word or in "Japanese JYUKEN". But actually it never is . > And I cast my FISHING LINE with THE BITE and as expected you have > pulled it and just bitten more than you can chew with a triumphant air. > > Ultimately your too many words are never advisable for me this time > as long as you can't answer the third of my following question mach > with your claiming to others: > > " What is the purpose of talking about GOOD OR WRONG English ? " > > Many and many times I would say that no one can precisely tell "bad " > or "right" to others negatively but affirmatively. More I would say , > "In English to make ourselves understood somehow or other is just > important . And except for which ANYTHING WILL DO ! " > > " YOU ARE SILLY AND STUPID STILL MORE HARMFUL ! " > > -- > v(^-^)v~pupu ! > > > v(^-^)v~pupu ! さん、ミスがあったから直してあげたね。おっほほほ。 ミスだらけで、どこから手をつけていいやらワカランがな。　ヽ(＾。＾)ノ