Shane wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009 18:11:29 -0700 (PDT), Rita B. Flesh wrote:
>
>> Men are truly worthless creatures and I don't understand why
>> 50% of the population are men. We don't need so many men.
>
> If they are worthless, why do you need any at all? Perhpas the fault
> lies with your perception rather than with males.
>>
>> 10% men would be enough.
>
> For what? Why would you need anything that is worthless?
>
>> We women should eat the other men,
>
> What do you mean by *other men*? are you suggesting that women are
> men? if so, wouldn't that also make them worthless?
>
>> since male meat is very
>> good.
>
> So men are not worthless? I wish you would make up your mind(tm).
>
>> So why aren't we a cannibal species where the women eat the
>> men???
>
> Possibly because the logic of doing so has never occurred to women, if
> your post is any indication of the overall logical capability of
> women.

Shane realizes that he would be one of the ones COOKED and eaten, as opposed 
to just eaten.