On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:23:22 +0900, Scott Reynolds <sar@gol.com>
belched the alphabet and kept on going with:

>On 10/31/2003 10:30 AM, The 2-Belo wrote:
>
>> And what is "near fluent"? Either you're fluent or you're not. 
>> 
>> Sorry about the segue here in the middle of this fine thread, but why does it
>> seem that fluency in Japanese, unlike other languages such as French, has a
>> hillion bazillion levels? When people hear, "Oh, Person X is fluent in Russian",
>> then they take that to mean that person can speak, read, and write pretty much
>> everything in Russian. But when people ask me if I'm fluent in Japanese, and I
>> answer "yes", they continue to hit me with several piles of questions to
>> pinpoint what I *really* mean when I say "fluent". Knock it off, folks. It's a
>> simple word with a simple meaning.
>
>Right, it means _perapera_.

That's a DANCE, you fucktard. Quit hanging around with Bryan so much.