I wrote:

>>The United States didn't lock up all Americans of German descent
>>in prison camps during WWII,"

wwerewolff@yahoo.com replied:

> --- Not all, but many - and it's a story that is untold to this day.
> They didn't lock up "all" people of Japanese descent either!

Can you provide references for this? The standard version is:

"President Franklin Roosevelt authorized the internment with United 
States Executive Order 9066, which allowed local military commanders to 
designate "military areas" as "exclusion zones", from which "any or all 
persons may be excluded." This power was used forthwith to declare most 
of the Pacific coast as "Military Area Number One", and all people with 
Japanese ancestry were then declared "Excluded". However, residents of 
German and Italian descent were not excluded."
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_Internment)

As far as I know, the main exceptions were, on the one hand, Japanese 
who signed up for the army (and even they could end up in a position 
where they were fighting for the United States while their family was 
interned) and, on the other, Germans and Italians who were caught 
behaving in a way that the Americans felt was a threat to the country.

Bottom line: Japanese-Americans were interned wholesale, whereas German- 
and Italian-Americans were interned only if and when they behaved 
treacherously.

I continued:

>>nor did they "bestow" democratic principles and a constitution on 
> Germany. Basically, they treated them like adults, and they 
> responded accordingly.

To which wwerewolf:

> --- Whoa!  You got that wrong!  The post-war occupation of Germany was
> infinitely more brutal than was their occupation of Japan

I doubt it, but in any case, brutality is not the issue, the issue is 
whether the Germans were given their head to reflect upon the evils of 
Nazism and rebuild their country as their conscience dictated (which in 
many ways they were) and whether Japan, by contrast, was moulded after 
the American image (which, again, in large part it was).

> to this day Germany remains an occupied country with foreign 
> tanks rolling down its streets...Japan does too.

I've been in Japan for thirteen years and never seen a tank (Japanese or 
American or any other kind). Never seen one in infrequent visits to 
Germany either.

> --- Did you know that more young surrendered German soldiers were
> deliberately murdered in Eisenhower's Death Camps than died during the
> entire war on the  western front?  

Frankly, if you'll believe that you'll believe anything.

Here's one link:
> 
> http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/us_war_crimes/Eisenhowers_death_camps.htm

Huh! On a site that features such gems as hate-monger Gordon "Jack" 
Mohr, who insisted that Protocols of the Elders of Zion was genuine, 
when it is categorically proven to be a forgery?!

What credibility do you think that has?

> --- There's a book on the subject called *Other Losses*.

Indeed there is. You are aware that its central thesis (that perhaps as 
many as a million German POWs died in captivity to the Allies) cannot be 
substantiated from any accepted sources and has been refuted by 
respectable historians the world over, including Germany?

James Braque's "non-fiction" contains fewer facts than his fictional 
works. What he did do was focus attention on an aspect of WWII history 
that had been little-researched and force a proper appraisal of it. The 
broad consensus of experts is that there was a germ of truth there, but 
that he exaggerated it so grossly that he is totally discredited, except 
in the eyes of the lunatic fringe (to which you appear to belong).

> --- Ever hear of Operation Keelhaul?  

It was agreed that citizens of the Soviet Union on Allied soil would be 
repatriated. Many, if not most of them, had not only fought in the Axis 
forces but were also committed to the Nazi/fascist ideology. Tens of 
thousands of them were summarily shot by the Russians, in reprisal for 
the suffering they had endured at Axis hands during the war. The Allies 
didn't directly kill them, perhaps, but certainly connived at their 
murder. Not quite on a par with the atrocities of the Nazi concentration 
camps, perhaps, but not very creditable behaviour.

But what bearing does this have on the discussion?

John
http://rarebooksinjapan.com