On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:35:03 +0000 (UTC), mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net
brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:

>Michael Cash <mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:29:05 +0000 (UTC), mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net
>> brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
>
>>>> found that to be a very minor part of the book. They're more ticked
>>>> over his activities around 1971-1972.
>>>
>>>Well, yes, and that nasty old press has reported they began attacking
>>>Kerry because of his anti-war stances back then.
>>>
>>>Not like they ever attacked, say, a MOH winner with anti-war stances,
>>>though...
>
>> How many MOH awardees (you don't "win" a MOH, it ain't a contest) with
>
>Right, and Rhodes Scholar isn't an "accomplishment"?
>
>So when Roosevelt won the MOH, nobody could properly write
>"Three Army generals above Roosevelt in the chain of command, including
>two who had already won the Medal of Honor themselves, recommended him
>for the medal", right?
>
>Or
>
>"Three Army generals above Roosevelt in the chain of command, including
>two who had already won the Medal of Honor themselves, recommended him
>for the medal"
>
>Right?
>
>But of course, you gently concede the point, yes?

No.
>
>As for much of the rest, most of it centers around his anti-war
>activities which I've already stated prompted most of the anti-Kerry 
>noises.
>
>> How many slept on watch?
>
>A a couple in WWII, according to accounts I used to read when I was more
>into the history of the time.

Sufficiently vague.





--

Michael Cash

"I am sorry, Mr. Cash, but we are unable to accept your rap sheet in lieu of
a high school transcript."

                                Dr. Howard Sprague
                                Dean of Admissions
                                Mount Pilot College