Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or 
property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, 
or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social 
objectives. US Federal Bureau of Investigation<

Read the sentence carefully. You didn’t hear it on any corporate media 
newscast since 9/11. It’s the official US FBI definition of terrorism. 
In its official definition, the FBI does not limit terrorism to 
stateless individuals or groups. In its official definition, the FBI 
does not suggest that terrorism cannot be perpetrated by the leader of a 
nation state. But even more amazing is that the official FBI definition 
of terrorism describes exactly what George Bush did in the aftermath of 
the attacks of 9/11!

APPLYING THE DEFINITION

• George W. Bush, in his unprovoked attack against the sovereign nation 
of Iraq, openly violated the UN Charter, to which the US is a signatory. 
The Charter's core principles contained in Article 2(4) and Article 51 
prohibit one nation from attacking another except in self-defense or 
with the authority of the U.N. In effect, George Bush launched an 
unlawful use of force against persons and property.
• The invasion launched by George W. Bush was heralded by the most 
frightening and powerful use of force and military violence in recent 
history. His Shock and Awe bombardment of Baghdad was designed to 
intimidate and coerce the government as well as the civilian population 
of that nation to change its existing leadership. That, in itself, was a 
political objective.
• The purpose of the invasion and ensuing occupation of Iraq was to 
replace the existing dictatorship with an American-backed form of 
democracy that would not permit the emergence of a government headed by 
the majority Shia religious leadership. These motives were 
unquestionably political and social.

So, what part of the FBI definition of “terrorism” do the voters of the 
United States not understand? And what acts of terrorism as defined by 
the FBI do the voters of the United States not recognize? Is there any 
doubt at all that the Bush administration committed acts of terrorism 
when it unlawfully used force and violence against the nation of Iraq to 
intimidate and coerce its government and the civilian population, in 
furtherance of the Bush/PNAC political and social objectives.

Therefore, by any definition, if George W. Bush is guilty of terrorism, 
he can accurately be identified as a TERRORIST.

READ THE PROOF: WHY BUSH LEADS THE WORLD AS A TERRORIST:

http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/editorial/reggies-commentary/20-regs-thoughts/750-why-george-w-bush-isthe-worlds-leading-terrorist