Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!news.moat.net!cox.net!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!fed1read04.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Message-ID: <42C313C9.BDFE1D00@hate.spam.net> From: Uncle Al Organization: The Noble Krell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,fj.sci.matter Subject: Re: Supplement to the paper on Doppler effect References: <1120071981.140831.221720@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 37 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:34:01 -0700 NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.5.212.127 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: fed1read04 1120080867 68.5.212.127 (Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:34:27 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:34:27 EDT Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.matter:270 None wrote: > > Dear Colleagues, > > Some time ago we published the paper > > "On transverse Doppler effect in frames of classical formalism" > > http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_1/contents5rus.html#doppler [snip] If it isn't: given any achievable velocities V1 and V2 and any finite lightspeed, the bound on the relative velocities of V1 and V2 as viewed by any inertial observer cannot exceed (V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2] This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of motion. For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta, Jackson gives u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2) u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2)) Relativistic doppler shift, http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-04/2-04.htm http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/reldop2.html http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~rfield/PHY2061/images/chp39_2.pdf then you are wrong. If it is, then you are redundant. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf