figmentPez wrote:
> "Daniel Kolle" <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:2ass81hrmt8kgv070fvrl81bpbs2ij8o4s@4ax.com...
> 
>>On Fri, 20 May 2005 08:39:59 -0400, massivegrooves
>><massivegrooves@massivegrooves.net> thought hard and wrote:
>>
>>>Phil Da Lick! wrote:
>>>Because this is 2005 ;) Just seems kinda weak not to have it in this day
>>>and age, in the past it was somewhat understandable.
>>
>>It speak volumes for Nintendo not to have voice acting.
> 
> 
> Yeah, and it says "We're so afraid of not being able to do it well, we're 
> not doing it at all!"
> 


Maybe, more I think about that maybe it is something along the lines of 
them fearing a backlash from some of the diehards...that they suddenly 
ruined thier game/character. Voice doesn't match what people have 
imagined over time. As I said in another post though it could even be 
that it may show more flaws in the story/writing being presented that 
way. Why they have failed to use voice acting in some games is beyond me...