Michael Cash wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:53:28 +0900, Brett Robson
> <deep_m_m@hotmail.com> brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
> 
>>necoandjeff wrote:
>>
>>>Brett Robson wrote:
>>>
>>>>necoandjeff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>necoandjeff wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>tm wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm thinking of visiting either Australia or NZ later this year,
>>>>>>>>>use up the ff points before the airlines go bankrupt. Any place
>>>>>>>>>you'd suggest as a must see?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What do you like? The desert is amazing, the Pilbarra on the NW
>>>>>>>>coast is amazing but expensive to travel to. NE is tropical
>>>>>>>>including rainforrest. SE is lovely temperate coastline and
>>>>>>>>grasslands. Or just check in to a nice hotel in Sydney and eat
>>>>>>>>and drink yourself silly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What if I want to see the underclass?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>you'll have to stay in the US for that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes. I'm sure the entire Australian underclass have moved to San
>>>>>Francisco, like all good homeless people do.
>>>>
>>>>I tell you what. Go to Sydney's Central Station in the late
>>>>afternoon and you'll be able to spot all the "homeless" people.
>>>>Then at around 5:30 they all head off to the Salvation Army for a
>>>>hot meal. After that they head "home", off to the Smith Family
>>>>Shelter for a shower and a place to sleep.
>>>>
>>>>It's not exactly the Hilton, but they are looked after.
>>>
>>>Doesn't sound quite the same as not having an underclass...
>>
>>Homeless people that aren't homeless, and poor people that are 
>>looked after might be a tough concept for Seppos.
> 
> Better keep this under your hat. All the San Francisco down-n-out
> folks will be moving to Sydney.

That would be cool. They could joins all the gays from SF who moved to 
Sydney because SF wasn't as gay and lesbian friendly.


-- 
Non gratum anus rodentum