Kevin Gowen wrote:
> John W. wrote:
> 
>> FreddieN wrote:
>>
>>> "John W." <worthj1970@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:418509B2.8070402@yahoo.com...
>>>
>>>> Kevin Gowen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> John W. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> FreddieN wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Freaking rags do another one:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a model of tolerance.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps you tolerate Islamofascism. I do not.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So 'Freaking rags' is an expression you approve of? Because that's the
>>>> part I was commenting on. Please illustrate where that shows tolerance
>>>> of Islamofacism.  Oh, wait, you can't.
>>>>
>>>> John W.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John...see my response to Mr Masayuki.
>>> I am afraid that my "tolerance" does not extend to Islmaofascists.
>>> Maybe if I had been in LA rather than NY, and only experienced
>>> it on the TV screen, I would be more "tolerant".
>>> I know I was certainly more "tolerant" before 911.
>>>
>> I was actually replying to Kevin. But I can't really think of a good 
>> reason to be a racist. Lot's of good excuses, but not a really good 
>> reason.
> 
> 
> What is the difference between an excuse and a reason?
> 
That should be obvious, particularly to a lawyer. But, then, you're a 
defense lawyer so that line might be a bit fuzzy to you.

John W.