Kevin Gowen wrote:

> Eric Takabayashi wrote:
> > I'm not sure you've had the chance to
> > elaborate on this before: if the UN is not
> > legitimate,
>
> Well, I don't know what you mean by "not legitimate". It clearly exists,
> but it has no executive, legislative, or compulsory judiciary power.
>
> > what would you have instead, and
> > to serve what purpose?
>
> I've talked about this before. I would have an organization of which
> only democratic states could be members. No security council, and no
> pretending to be a world government.

Thank you. Fine. That's done.

--
 "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know that
I can shove more than three burgers in my mouth!"