Michael Cash wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:03:15 -0500, "John W." <worthj1970@yahoo.com>
> brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
> 
> 
>>Michael Cash wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:32:37 -0500, "John W." <worthj1970@yahoo.com>
>>>brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Michael Cash wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:15:00 -0500, "John W." <worthj1970@yahoo.com>
>>>>>brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Working on an annual surplus is a good start. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Why should the government have a surplus?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>To give more to me.
>>>
>>>
>>>That they stole from someone else?
>>>
>>
>>I figure it deserves to go back to the People. Well, I'm just as much a 
>>People as anybody else.
> 
> 
> My point is that if they didn't have an immediate need for it (within
> that budget year, or perhaps the next) then it shouldn't have been
> taken from the People to begin with. And I have no problem with paying
> down the debt. If they're going to actually use the "surplus" to pay
> down the debt, then fine. But is that actually what was going to be
> done with it?
> 
That's a good point. I'm not sure if that's what Clinton was doing with 
the money or not. Maybe that 'extra' cash could go into Social Security 
or towards a national health care plan.

>>They don't have to give me cash. A job would be enough for me.
> 
> 
> Have you sought employment in the government sector?
> 
Yep.

John W.