Michael Cash wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 2004 16:47:56 GMT, Jim <eternal_dna@hotmail.com>
> brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
> 
> 
>>Kevin Wayne Williams wrote:
>>
>>>John W. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Murgi" <srindler@da2.so-net.ne.jp> wrote in message 
>>>>news:<add80b4ec86cbee6124feed797c03804@news.secureusenet.com>...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"John W." <worthj1970@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:409599B5.1070303@yahoo.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Anyone know a good place to buy shoes online for kids? Got a special
>>>>>>request from the sperm child...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What's a "sperm child"? Still frozen in liquid nitrogen without feet 
>>>>>to need
>>>>>shoes?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That's a child of my sperm, as opposed to one of someone else's sperm.
>>>>And I'm really just assuming that fact.
>>>
>>>
>>>That you would write that in a public forum sends little chills up my 
>>>spine.
>>>
>>
>>Well, if he hasn't done a dna test... there's no way to
>>be sure, is there?  I've read that upwards of 30% of children born
>>in two-parent households are not the product of the husband.
> 
> 
> Sounds like a good argument against two-parent households.
> 

I don't know... in the good ole USA, there are daytime "talk" shows,
maury povich, jenny jones and others, who put on "who's the daddy"
shows.  The mother is trying to pin fatherhood on some guy... and
the dna tests always come out without a match.  So they have these
recurring guests, who are searching through their memory, trying to
remember any guy they had sex with previously to try to track down
baby's daddy.  Some of these "ladies" trot out 5,6, 7, or even 8 guys
and even then some of them don't find the biological father.

Those kids will love watching the reruns when they're old enough to
understand.