Re: "Compulsory" health checks
Ken Yasumoto-Nicolson wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2004 04:15:45 -0700, still_the_same_me@hotmail.com (James
> Annan) wrote:
>
>
>>and an annual
>>full chest x-ray of completely healthy people for the theoretical
>>possibility of TB must be a very poor bet.
>
>
> Ahh, so that's why they do it. I was going to ask why. Next question
> is is there any scientific evidence of effectiveness to support this
> procedure?
Um...wrong question. This _is_ Japan we are talking about. There does
seem to be a bit of a TB problem here but of course it is the homeless
and unemployed who have the big risk and no employer's health check to
diagnose it.
I've only actually had the x-ray once or twice out of the three
check-ups so far, and no-one seemed to care when I missed it. The whole
check-up thing is so obviously a "must be done" process rather than any
genuine concern for the health of the staff, which is why I am so
unenthusiastic about devoting a half-day after my return to visiting
some medical facility to get poked and prodded by people with no useful
work to do. Especially if it is likely to actually be injurious to my
health.
James
--
If I have seen further than others, it is
by treading on the toes of giants.
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735