Re: "Compulsory" health checks
Murgi wrote:
>>I've had them through three companies. At each one, the results were
>>sent to the employer, who then handed them over to the employees.
>
> Of course, unopened... I suppose.
> But who knows whether the company also receives the precise results of your
> health condition in an additional letter?
>
> Sigi
Sigi, a company that wants to know the precise results WILL know them.
From a privacy standpoint, its a ridiculous situation.
I got an additional surprise this year. As well as the health check
shindig (as an employee of my company I do the health check tango too) I
am now required to do an extra and separate test because I am running a
bar as a side business. Since I am the registered
shokuhineiseikanrininsha, apparently I need to submit a stool sample
twice yearly. How exactly I'm to gather this sample isn't something I've
worked out the logistics of, given that there isn't a Japanese style
toilet anywhere closeby that I know of. I asked if giving the sample
this wasn't a little strange in this day and age - given that HACCP and
other techniques will be more vital - but apparently the powers that be
have declared that it is the destiny of some unfortunate young boffin in
a white suit down at the Okazaki City Medical Association Public Health
Center to sift through my sample for 0-157, salmonella and the like.
I shit you not.
--
"Oh don't give me none more of that Old Janx Spirit/ No, don't you give
me none more of that Old Janx Spirit/ For my head will fly, my tongue
will lie, my eyes will fry and I may die/ Won't you pour me one more of
that sinful Old Janx Spirit"
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735