From: "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity
References: <a42650fc.0312231529.65b841bd@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0312281440.1ee617e7@posting.google.com> <2a0cceff.0312281924.7853d32f@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com> <btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com> <3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net> <3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <btf1dj$hqp$3@hercules.btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: New Year question from Leo
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:36:32 +0100
Lines: 44
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200
NNTP-Posting-Host: imspc28.epfl.ch
Message-ID: <3ffbd2be$1@epflnews.epfl.ch>
X-Trace: epflnews.epfl.ch 1073468094 128.178.153.55 (7 Jan 2004 10:34:54 +0200)
Organization: EPFL
Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!onodera-news!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.mailgate.org!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!epflnews.epfl.ch!not-for-mail
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.matter:51


"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:btf1dj$hqp$3@hercules.btinternet.com...
>
> "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
> news:3ffa73fa$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> >
> > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message
> > news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net...
> > > "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
> > > news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> > > >
> > > > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
> > > > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > [snip
> > > > >
> > > > > . This theorem is
> > > > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then you are a crackpot.
> > > >
> > > > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot...
> > >
> > > Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's.
> >
> > Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with
> > Newton's equations.
> > Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of
> > Maxwell.
>
> The argument is about whether Maxwells equations and Special Relativity
are
> compatible with one another.

I did not see that argument. Possibly a post is missing in my newsreader...

Regards,
Harald