Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!onodera-news!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch (Harry)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Dynamic magnetic field is open
Date: 9 Jan 2004 08:31:07 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <3bff5641.0401090831.78b535f5@posting.google.com>
References: <a42650fc.0311131609.38d0c417@posting.google.com> <3fcc646c$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <a42650fc.0312091449.f8008c1@posting.google.com> <3bff5641.0312101230.708655fd@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0312141522.1bcae46a@posting.google.com> <3fdf31a0$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <a42650fc.0312182035.7f293440@posting.google.com> <3fe6d3cc$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> <a42650fc.0312281435.4d881b29@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.178.153.55
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1073665871 8357 127.0.0.1 (9 Jan 2004 16:31:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:31:11 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.matter:60

Dear Sergey,

I got tired from our discussion, but I did not lift my main objections
from my first post.

I like to elaborate on one point that I only hinted at at first and
then I only roughly sketched it.  I had the impression, and you did
not comment on it, that you treat a surface integral as if it is a
line integral, with very bad consequences, and I mentioned dimensional
analysis.

According to you, for an experiment in which you have a wire just
inside a rectangular gap, either along the long or the short side: "my
emf has to depend on ratio between the long and short sides of gap. "
I concluded from that - in agreement from what I concluded from your
paper - that then the emf should be proportional to the length of the
wire inside the gap, as the forces of moving charges simply add up.

Then EMF = length * <speed of change of flux> or:
Volt = m * Wb/m^2 /s = Wb/s /m = V*s/s /m = V/m.
That can't be right, and would be detected when for example changing
the scale of designed electromotors.

As I wrote, according to standard theory, Volt = surface * <speed of
change of flux>.
Thus  Volt = m^2 * Wb/m^2 /s = Wb/s = V*s/s = V

Best wishes for 2004!

Harald