Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!onodera-news!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!206.82.68.46!not-for-mail From: Rick Newsgroups: soc.culture.british,soc.culture.scottish,soc.culture.welsh,soc.culture.japan,fj.life.in-japan Subject: Re: Why do British hate american culture? Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:24:33 -0500 Organization: Nomads of Cyberspace Lines: 41 Message-ID: <3FFBA621.61381CBA@alltel.net> References: <1rhmvvchjh3ssv51uucajlndemfbqddqdc@4ax.com> <0lomvvcj9frk03m771f2i47vq1chltgr6t@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.82.68.46 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1073456610 7113011 206.82.68.46 ([209746]) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en]C-CCK-MCD EBM-Compaq (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:9918 JJD wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:37:55 GMT, Josiah Jenkins > wrote: > > >>>>> >>>> > I have seen thread digressions before but this most surely take the > >>>>> >>>cake! > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> Someone's serving cake? > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>>We always have cake with our tea here in scb. Unless we have crumpet, > >>>>of > >>>>> >>>course. > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>And scones. Don't forget the scones. > >>>>> > > >>>>> >Would you provide a pronounciation guide for the foreign johnnies, > >>>>> >Jeff? There's a good chap. > >>>>> > >>>>> What, and provide them with one of the ultimate clues to Britishness? > >>>>> I should jolly well think not. Foreign johnnies must learn their > >>>>> place. > >> > >>>>"Englishness" JJ (may I call you JJ?). > >>> > >>>Not on scs, you may not ! > >>> > >>One is not "on" scs. > > > >"One" has been cross-posted to scs. > >So, like it or nay, one is on it ! > > > One's posts can be put wherever others might choose, but it doesn't > mean one acknowledges these lesser locations as having any import. > One is in scb and that is simply that. > > JJD Proper, ain't one?