Jason O'Rourke wrote:

> Ron, maybe his time is worth more than your's?  He found a solution that
> costs less than $400.  So long as he has a organization that keeps track
> of all the images, it's likely to be much more cost effective to keep
> the stuff.  You could spent weeks deciding what should go or stay.  And
> compression -- why would someone who amassed 35k images think about
> degrading them that way?

He means file compression, like .zip, not image compression.

Colin D.