Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!onodera-news!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!nntp.theplanet.net!inewsm1.nntp.theplanet.net!newspeer.lavaseals.co.uk!zen.net.uk!cox.net!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!fed1read05.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3F5D6FA8.53AF@cox.net> From: Crownfield Reply-To: Crownfield@cox.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.dcameras,alt.graphics.photoshop,alt.photography,fj.comp.dev.digital-camera,rec.photo.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm Subject: Re: Fuji Finepix S2 and Portraits References: <7bBZa.150063$rsJ.32218@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <8QXZa.5744$SV1.374405252@mantis.golden.net> <%Sd_a.5794$ae4.380475425@mantis.golden.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 30 Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 23:14:00 -0700 NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.4.46.103 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: fed1read05 1063088037 68.4.46.103 (Tue, 09 Sep 2003 02:13:57 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 02:13:57 EDT Organization: Cox Communications Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.comp.dev.digital-camera:845 Gymmie Bob wrote: > > Yes, the S2 has less resolution than some -and is an old partially obsolete > camera. low noise, 12mp, asa 1600 to 100. what is your camera with more than 12 mp? any digital camera is obsolete the year it comes out. they work perfectly anyway. > > "Bob Hatch" wrote in message > news:bh9obs$vm1pl$1@ID-85448.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "Gymmie Bob" wrote in message > > news:X8_Za.5757$882.375100527@mantis.golden.net... > > > I bought both my Fuji cameras at Target stores. Paying too much doesn't > > make > > > the quality better. > > > > > > > > Do you even come close to understanding the difference between an S2 and a > > $300 FinePix? > > -- > > http://www.bobhatch.com > > Our web site about RV Stuff > > A work in progress > > > >