masayuki yoshida wrote:

> Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote in message news:<3F097A8F.EE5AE0BA@yahoo.co.jp>...
> > masayuki yoshida wrote:
> >
> > > Let me ask you a question, John. Which do you think was a more
> > > villainous nation as a collonialist, Japan or Britain?
> >
> > Both were evil. But Britain seems to have had longer lasting, and more beneficial effects. I don't see Japan going back
> > to a closed agricultural society after the Occupation ended, either, as they seem to LIKE the lifestyle they saw and the
> > new freedoms they enjoyed, AFTER a few million of them died and they were NUKED twice.
> >
> > So what's your view? Which was worse, Britain or Japan, and why?
> >
> > Will you admit Japan did anything wrong, or give an opinion what should be done about it?
>
> Oh, I've found your favouvite term - should.

It is also a Japanese term, and also favored.

> I don't feel interested
> in discussing any historical fact by a simple moral standard.

Then Japanese should learn the same when it applies to matters affecting them, such as the situation in North Korea. Yes,
North Korea took, and continues to hold, Japanese citizens. There are also thousands of Japanese citizens and their children
in North Korea, if still alive. They have a nuclear development program. They are unfriendly toward Japan.

There is no should about it, it is simple fact. Japanese should shut their mouths.

> Sorry about that.
>
> Masayuki