masayuki yoshida wrote:

> > I am sure that Japanese know that much, that people in countries such as South
> > Korea and China bear grudges over the war. They can get that from the news.
> > What is not dwelt upon is WHY such people might remain angry nearly 60 years
> > after the war ended.
>
> I don't care about their new generation's angry so much, over half of
> which was made by their ideological and biased school textbooks,
> government's propaganda, great persistence (by cloves of Korean
> garlic) and masochistic mentality.

Yes, Chinese and Korean versions of history, from the little I've seen or read,
certainly seem biased. I am particularly interested in Chinese victim counts. Those
are issues that should be investigated and settled.

So, back to Japan, do you not believe there is any bias in Japanese history when
Japanese focus on Japanese suffering 60 years later ("Never forget") while telling
Asians that their war issues have been settled, or that it happened a long time
ago?