"John Yamamoto-Wilson" <j-yamamo@sophia.ac.jp> wrote in message news:bavdqf$41s45$1@ID-169501.news.dfncis.de...
> I wrote:
> 
> > > OK, my *final* word (promise ya, soc.hist!).
> 
> Hadn't noticed soc.history had already been trimmed from the header. Well,
> I'll trim soc.culture.german, since it's got little enough to do with them.
> The rest of you'll just have to put up with me. Sorry, but this guy just
> keeps coming back, and since I believe that where there's life there's hope
> I've just got to keep talking to him!

What a self-centered person you are! Don't you see that you are ALSO
the one that keeps coming back from an objective view point? Please
don't be serious against this comment because I'm just laughing.

> Kaz wrote:
> 
> > So, according to your theory defining that a racist who call someone
> > subhuman is subhuman, your comment is subhuman drivel.
> 
> What?! Don't you *ever* listen?! The main point of my last half dozen
> postings is the exact opposite!! A racist who calls someone subhuman is
> *not* subhuman. The comment "subhuman drivel" is directed at the *use of
> language*, not at the person.

Ok, since you are the one who establishs that theory. I don't care
about being a subhuman anymore. Whatever you call me, it would be fine
for me.

> Racial insult = subhuman drivel because it is directed against *people*
> *Calling* racial insults subhuman drivel  does *not* =  subhuman drivel
> because it is *not* directed against people.
> 
> Got it?

Ok, because you are the king of this castle.

> > > Calling it crude is fair comment
> >
> > No, it's a negative word and aggressive.
> 
> Really? Well, you would know all about "negative" and "aggressive" words,
> wouldn't you, since your postings are full of them.

Because I was upset about Supertech's postings.

> > It's only fair to subhuman  like you.
> 
> Now, *that's* subhuman drivel, because it's directed at a person (me, in
> this case). It's the language of insult, not the language of reason. If it
> makes you feel better to use it, go ahead. But it's still subhuman drivel.

Yes, you are the king of this castle.

> > All those tokyojaps in fj.soc.politics have been calling me as "chon"
> > for years though.
> 
> Probably because they know it winds you up. If they were like most of the
> Japanese I know, though, they would take the view that it is the person who
> *uses* the insults who looks bad, not the person being insulted.

People tend to have different humanity from what they are in the real
society when they are on internet. But many tokyojaps show their
aggressive attitudes against kansai-jin even in right front of me in
the real society.

> > > You didn't want to hurt anyone when
> > > you said all that about stinking Hun-gooks and sick self-esteemed
> offensive
> > > racists, did you? How unfair that *you* should get hurt!

Those Koreans racists are having sick superiority complex against us,
such as calling us like Midgets. They are extremely despising us and
looking down on us so it will not hurt any of them, I think. You
should be aware that traditionally the Koreans look down on us
severely like calling us with a quite derogatory term such as
"Joppari". And that's why I'm ironically using the term "Huns" because
Huns are the well-known tribe that has an extreme sick superiority
complex. It's true that the Koreans are well-influenced people by
Huns. Maybe they really have Hun's blood.

> > Admitting the phenomenon of your being nervous about the term
> > "Hun-gooks" and "sick self-esteemed offensive racists" would prove
> > that you are either a "Hun" or a "sick self-esteemed offensive
> > racist".
> 
> But I'm not nervous about it, Kaz. I know you *intended* it to be hurtful,
> but to me it's just sick.

But complaining too much about it makes you seem like you are nervous.

> And one point from an earlier posting:
> 
> > But surely you hurted me, so it's sarcasm. I'm very nervous about
> > people ethnically insult me because of being Kansai-jin.
> 
> If I have hurt you it's not because you are Kansai-jin. It's because you
> insult everyone else's ethnicity, 

I don't think I insulted anyone besides the ethnocentric racist
Koreans.

> but are so nervous about being "ethnically
> insulted" yourself that you imagine insults where there are none (just how
> have I insulted you ethnically, Kaz?). 

You have insulted with stating as "Osakan's genes are recessive".

> It's because you can't see the
> difference between insults (directed at people) and criticism (directed at
> people's arguments and use of language). It's because you want to scream
> hatred at the world, and can't face being told that the problem is not the
> world but your hatred.

No matter how you claim it's criticism, it's just insults if you ever
hurt an individual.
I don't have any hatred at the world and I don't want to scream
either. Don't speculate about me.
Some people in the world are having hatred against the Japanese or
Kansai-jin. And that's the issue. I see many biased point of view in
your comments.

And..... Would you be not so serious about it? I feel like you are
ranting and am getting tired about arguing. Just take a deep breath
and relax....