necoandjeff wrote:
> I expect Kevin would accept the former as a valid reason why this is none of
> his business. After all, he has made it abundantly clear how much of the
> business of foreigners U.S. politics is. And, as you point out, it is absurd
> to consider the killing or euthanizing of a newborn as a form of abortion,

I can't believe I whooshed you, of all people, with my use of "abortion" 
in this case.

> which already weakens the latter reason. But even in the case of ordinary
> (by which I mean first trimester) abortion, male abortion opponents have
> made it abundantly clear that they feel a woman's body *is* their business.
> So even without the absurdity of considering this abortion, I doubt he would
> accept the latter as a valid reason why this is none of his business.

I suppose women shouldn't have an opinion about laws that require 
fathers to pay child support, either. A man's wallet is none of their 
business.

-- 
Kevin
"This is the best election night in history."--Democratic National 
Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe, Nov. 2, 2004, just before 8 p.m. EST