Michael Cash wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:59:11 +0800, "Sryn" <sryn@yahoo.DELETETHIS.com>
> brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
> 
> 
>>"Kevin Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote in message 
>>news:2tg3c2F1uuvaqU22@uni-berlin.de...
>>
>>>Eric Takabayashi wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm not sure you've had the chance to
>>>>elaborate on this before: if the UN is not
>>>>legitimate,
>>>
>>>Well, I don't know what you mean by "not legitimate". It clearly exists,
>>>but it has no executive, legislative, or compulsory judiciary power.
>>>
>>>
>>>>what would you have instead, and
>>>>to serve what purpose?
>>>
>>>I've talked about this before. I would have an organization of which
>>>only democratic states could be members. No security council, and no
>>>pretending to be a world government.
>>>
>>>- Kevin
>>
>>Is there any teeth in that?
> 
> 
> Since there are no teeth in the UN, we would be no worse off.
> 
> Kevin, it may be time to trot out my old post showing what constitutes
> a majority in a world government.

Bring it on!

- Kevin