I am into 56 and still having sex with my wife.

My meditation makes me a great performer in sex.
Let me have your daughter, so she can tell you how good I am in bed.

http://sg.geocities.com/alex_kew/meditation.html  .

On Mar 28, 9:07 am, "Mohammed  the  Holy  Nabi" <Moonyon...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> well,once  you reach the  ripe old age of  50 ,
> you don ' t  want to fuck any more .
>
> On Mar 27, 1:39 am, "Mettas Mother" <mettas_mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I cannot disagree.
>
> > "the Cunt of Saint Mary of Nazareth" <veak...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1174981502.117415.64890@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Mettas ,
> > > fucking is the most important  act of nature .
>
> > > the  Japs  had wanted  to rape  Nanjing ,
> > > the Chinese  also wants to rape  Malay' s territory .
>
> > > what the Japs  did in   Nanjing is  by military  force ,
> > > what the Chinese are  doing in Malaysia is by financial force .
>
> > > But the Chinese have  used the same military  tactics in Tibet as the
> > > Japs  did    in Nanjing .
>
> > > So why all this  Hoo-Ha-s ?
>
> > > the Chinese are  doing the  same thing in Tibet as the Japs have  done
> > > in Nanjing .
>
> > > but , remember , the Chinese race  has taken native lands in Malaysia,
> > > in Tibet ,
> > > the Japs  have returned  home to Japan  from Malaysia ,
> > > but the Chinese race in Malaysia  is refusing to return home to
> > > China .
> > > This is the difference  between the Japs  and the Chinese race  in
> > > this  new  century .
>
> > > the Japs  are  now  well  behaved ,
> > > but the Chinese race  continues to take more native lands
> > > in Myanma,
> > > in Malaysia ,
> > > in Inodnesia,
> > > in Tibet ,
> > > in Xinjiang Uyghur .
>
> > > On Mar 27, 1:29 pm, "Mettas Mother" <mettas_mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > Sex, rape, paedophilia, bestiality, incest, homosexuality,
> > > > heterosexuality, intersexuality, asexuality, bisexuality,
> > > > polysexuality and polyamorous are all acts of nature.
>
> > > > "Alex" <alex_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:1174955884.804083.250460@r56g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > This is what is in the mind of some Malays who rob and raped Chinese
> > > > > women. The Mongolian model might be raped before exploded into pieces.
> > > > > Is this what you consider Muslim mentality ? Raping and killing
> > > > > innocent women is a heineous crime. You think your Allah can forgive
> > > > > and pardon you Muslims ?
>
> > > > > On Mar 26, 5:28 pm, "Mohammed  the  Holy  Nabi" <Moonyon...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Rape  of  Nanjing  =  Chinese  soldiers  raped  Tibetans monks .
>
> > > > > > These were  purely  sexual  acts in the past .
>
> > > > > > Japanese  soldiers  raped  Nanjing  =  Chinese people  raped  Malay'
> > > > > > s  territory .
>
> > > > > > All these were  purely sexual  activities .
>
> > > > > > On Mar 25, 4:45 pm, "Alex" <alex_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You are not a Chinese because Chinese would not put 'Chinese race
> > > > > > > wants to take over Malaysia'.>From your profile, you posted very little articles.
>
> > > > > > > An open forum is subject to many abuses and it is up to the forum
> > > > > > > moderator to discipline the members. Members can just advice other
> > > > > > > members to behave properly, that is all.
>
> > > > > > > Rape of Nanking is so famous that many books are written on it. Read
> > > > > > > them all and don't expect members here to contribute facts and
> > > > > > > pictures. They can just make a link or links to other websites that
> > > > > > > indulge in this topic.
>
> > > > > > > Iran is disputing the Holocaust, so is Japan disputing the Rape of
> > > > > > > Nanking. Some people are also sceptical about the killing field in
> > > > > > > Cambodia, especially the figures of dead.
>
> > > > > > > Most of the victims in the Holocaust and Rape of Nanking are already
> > > > > > > dead, so evidence is hard to come by to prove Holocaust, Rape of
> > > > > > > Nanking, killing field etc etc.
>
> > > > > > > On Mar 25, 5:53 pm, "Zhongwei" <ingham.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I am disgusted by the posts here.
>
> > > > > > > > Firstly to argue clearly you must each state your points and clearly
> > > > > > > > define which points are not agreed upon. The point of an argument is
> > > > > > > > to arrive upon a resolution: ie. the truth. Trying to force your
> > > > > > > > opinions onto others does nothing but widen the gap in understanding
> > > > > > > > that already exists.
>
> > > > > > > > For the truth to be discovered one does not get swept in the feelings
> > > > > > > > of nationalist rivalries and racism, but instead attempts to
> > > > > > > > understand the history of the period. Opinions here appear to be based
> > > > > > > > on half-truths with little attempt to view the discussion objectively.
> > > > > > > > Here, objectively means to put asside your own personal subjective
> > > > > > > > perceptions and attitudes, and attempt to apply logic and reason to
> > > > > > > > the problem.
>
> > > > > > > > Name calling and put downs do not bring about a resolution where by
> > > > > > > > all parties agree. An argument is not supposed to be a mindless rant.
>
> > > > > > > > I am interested in discussing the topic of the "Rape of Nanjing". Does
> > > > > > > > anyone have any valid points to make? Removing nationalist and racist
> > > > > > > > slander from your post would be ideal. Thankyou- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -