the  murderers of the Mongolian  model should be punished ,

according to Islamic laws,

by having their sexual organs  totally squashed .

the Malaysian government should  cut off the sex organs  of these
murderers .




On Mar 26, 4:38 pm, "Alex" <alex_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> This is what is in the mind of some Malays who rob and raped Chinese
> women. The Mongolian model might be raped before exploded into pieces.
> Is this what you consider Muslim mentality ? Raping and killing
> innocent women is a heineous crime. You think your Allah can forgive
> and pardon you Muslims ?
>
> On Mar 26, 5:28 pm, "Mohammed  the  Holy  Nabi" <Moonyon...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Rape  of  Nanjing  =  Chinese  soldiers  raped  Tibetans monks .
>
> > These were  purely  sexual  acts in the past .
>
> > Japanese  soldiers  raped  Nanjing  =  Chinese people  raped  Malay'
> > s  territory .
>
> > All these were  purely sexual  activities .
>
> > On Mar 25, 4:45 pm, "Alex" <alex_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > You are not a Chinese because Chinese would not put 'Chinese race
> > > wants to take over Malaysia'.>From your profile, you posted very little articles.
>
> > > An open forum is subject to many abuses and it is up to the forum
> > > moderator to discipline the members. Members can just advice other
> > > members to behave properly, that is all.
>
> > > Rape of Nanking is so famous that many books are written on it. Read
> > > them all and don't expect members here to contribute facts and
> > > pictures. They can just make a link or links to other websites that
> > > indulge in this topic.
>
> > > Iran is disputing the Holocaust, so is Japan disputing the Rape of
> > > Nanking. Some people are also sceptical about the killing field in
> > > Cambodia, especially the figures of dead.
>
> > > Most of the victims in the Holocaust and Rape of Nanking are already
> > > dead, so evidence is hard to come by to prove Holocaust, Rape of
> > > Nanking, killing field etc etc.
>
> > > On Mar 25, 5:53 pm, "Zhongwei" <ingham.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I am disgusted by the posts here.
>
> > > > Firstly to argue clearly you must each state your points and clearly
> > > > define which points are not agreed upon. The point of an argument is
> > > > to arrive upon a resolution: ie. the truth. Trying to force your
> > > > opinions onto others does nothing but widen the gap in understanding
> > > > that already exists.
>
> > > > For the truth to be discovered one does not get swept in the feelings
> > > > of nationalist rivalries and racism, but instead attempts to
> > > > understand the history of the period. Opinions here appear to be based
> > > > on half-truths with little attempt to view the discussion objectively.
> > > > Here, objectively means to put asside your own personal subjective
> > > > perceptions and attitudes, and attempt to apply logic and reason to
> > > > the problem.
>
> > > > Name calling and put downs do not bring about a resolution where by
> > > > all parties agree. An argument is not supposed to be a mindless rant.
>
> > > > I am interested in discussing the topic of the "Rape of Nanjing". Does
> > > > anyone have any valid points to make? Removing nationalist and racist
> > > > slander from your post would be ideal. Thankyou- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -