Scott Reynolds wrote:
> Declan Murphy wrote:
> > Nick Maclaren wrote:
> >> In article <4455d65d@212.67.96.135>,
> >> Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" <reply@newsgroups.com> writes:
> >> |>
> >> |> Nick it does enlarge sufficiently to see the "cherry like" bark and much
> >> |> more detail of the flowers.  It looks like one of those graft type things
> >> |> that has been buggad around with.
> >> |> Perhaps a Daphne on a pear:-)
> >>
> >> The bark doesn't look very cherry-like to me - it was the thing that made
> >> me think that it WASN'T a cherry -  and I can't see any detail on the
> >> flowers.
> >
> > Photos aren't the best, but would these 4 help identify it at all?
> > http://www.declan.tv/gardening_misadventures/what_tree_is_this.html
>
> Your digital camera seems to be doing a great job of getting the ground
> into sharp focus and ignoring the tree.

I know. Though it might be my lawn fetish. When it stops raining I'll
try again.