Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!news.moat.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: catbrier04@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: fj.life.in-japan,soc.culture.french,soc.culture.german,soc.women,soc.men
Subject: Re: IS the female orgasm a myth?
Date: 5 Dec 2005 11:35:39 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <1133811339.940348.163370@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1133451264.212138.306630@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <WgJjf.2071$Zb2.501@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>
   <1133474561.368865.244830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <PYMjf.2116$Zb2.1967@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>
   <hPNjf.8009$N45.4534@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
   <UBOjf.2577$fO5.2302@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
   <1133540474.436419.253510@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1133541360.943941.40890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1133542004.135064.271220@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <1133553036.412254.103710@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
   <1133658391.228730.79950@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1133721632.238902.58160@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <cfb4$43937b29$506d7ce5$4652@news.chello.at>
   <1133798362.244241.235410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <d10cb$43948283$506d7ce5$21800@news.chello.at>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.189.81.77
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1133811345 26395 127.0.0.1 (5 Dec 2005 19:35:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:35:45 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <d10cb$43948283$506d7ce5$21800@news.chello.at>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=198.189.81.77;
   posting-account=uL21fA0AAACE5WZLGtUvGf_kpCOdn8j6
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:30647

>It is. Unfortunately the categories that you use in your phrasing
>reflect your real thinking better than your assertions. You equate
>assertiveness with ..with "hitting 'em back" ..that's  aggressive.
>You equate non assertiveness with "passivity" "submission" "inaction"
>hence "be a loser".
>Good luck, but my experience is different.

Well, I'm not passive-aggressive. Defending one's self is NOT an act of
aggression. Nor have I ever been passive or submissive.

Cat