Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!news.moat.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: marthawhite2000@yahoo.co.uk
Newsgroups: japan.soc.transgender
Subject: Love Thy Neighbor. Bring Them Happiness. Get Them High!
Date: 5 Oct 2005 05:58:22 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <1128517102.531219.132380@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.155.151.82
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1128517108 12325 127.0.0.1 (5 Oct 2005 12:58:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:58:28 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.155.151.82;
   posting-account=mab-FA0AAAAKgXk3AV9Wpx_ogQrajEkR
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org japan.soc.transgender:100

Many libertarians believe that the sole purpose why we need government
is for security.
Two people will not agree with it. The unattractive, and the
unproductive.

Of course, those who cannot compete by giving better offer are not
going to just admit it by saying so. Those who demand sex laws against
consensual sex will not say, "I oppose free sex because no women want
me and I want to ration females to inferior males such as I am." It's
not to their best interest to be honest and they'll come up with
something else.

So what?

Well, within a democratic frameworks, for example, those inferior
people will demand sex laws and social programs to mask their lack of
capability.

So fuck democracy! Well, not that simple. You see, without democracy,
the alternative is civil war. We're in deep shit no matter what.

Hardcore libertarians will simply say, "Kill them all! They violated
individual freedom, they want war. Summon Pinochet, etc."

Not here.

You see, Jesus told us to love our enemy. Rather than killing them all
we should try to appease them by making them happy.

Of course, we should do so at the minimum cost.

I once suggested that the rich should help eliminate poverty by
knocking up as many females as possible. That way, the ratio between
the productive people and the parasitic will be more and more.

That way, for a much lower level of sacrifice from the productive, the
parasites will get more. It's win win. The thing is this brilliant idea
is prohibited by bigots.

Apparently, envy, rather than need, cause their unhappiness. We need to
think of more ways to make enemies of freedom happy with minimum
deviation from meritocracy.

How can we make people happy with minimum cost?

Well, we get them high!

Think it this way, you come to a good for nothing no body, and say,
"Stop making kids, embrace capitalism, here's food, shelter, and
dope!" Do you think they'll object?

It's victimless and humane way to get rid the inferior from the gene
pool. Nowadays, many people clink to hunger. With small cash, the smart
among them can use the cash we give to start a business rather than use
dope. Either way, they'll be happy.

Now, they'll have a choice to be happy.

They'll be happier, we'll be happier. So why not?

If we don't give them free dopes, they'll demand something much more
expensive, like jobs, or public school. Even worse, they'll demand sex
laws that ration females to poor dumb males. That'll make the poor
breed like rabbits costing us more money.

I tell you the truth. Love your enemy, get them high! For that way
you'll be like your Father in heaven that pour rain to the bad as well
as the good guy. It's happier to those who give than to those who
receive. The meek, shall inherit the earth.
Who knows, heaven is just hell on dope.


Now some would say that drugs are expensive. Not if it were legal.

Consensual usage is victimless. Prohibition of dope is not victimless.
Just like tax, job creation, subsidy, and sex laws.

Jim