Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!CALA-MUZIK!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: h.poropudas@luukku.com
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Reality of black holes
Date: 14 Jul 2005 00:40:29 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <1121326829.557025.316000@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
References: <1121164075.088598.63020@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.231.240.27
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1121326835 32058 127.0.0.1 (14 Jul 2005 07:40:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:40:35 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1121164075.088598.63020@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=130.231.240.27;
   posting-account=KcV1Uw0AAADA_SUhHtf2s5c47zQYRxgl
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.matter:281



None wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We are going on publishing the 5th volume of works of our laboratory
> with the paper
>
> " On reality of black holes "
>
> *Abstract*
>
> We will analyse the basic phenomenological and mathematical approaches
> of Relativity when having built the General theory of relativity. In
> particular, we will consider the ways, how Einstein derived the
> regularity of light velocity with respect to the value of gravity
> potential; how Schwarzschild derived the metric of stationary point
> black hole; how Landau made his derivation for a collapsing dust
> sphere; Oppenheimer's derivation for a collapse of dying star, as well
> as the features and incentives, how and why had Einstein introduced his
> lambda term.
> On the basis of analysis of the above approaches, we will show full
> inconsistency of the statements of problems to the corresponding
> processes in real physical systems, artificial mathematical
> transformations based on ignoring the logic sequence of formal
> mathematical derivation, on unfoundedly introduced ad libitum, doubtful
> postulates and on arbitrarily composed mathematical expressions.

I peg you pardon, but what postulates of General Relativity
you don't accept and what postulates you suggest instead.
Please clarify your writing !

Hannu

>
> We hope much that the aspects analysed in this paper will be of help to
> the specialists who rely in their interpretations on the models of
> black holes to understand better the discrepancies of this theory.
> Enjoy reading
>
> http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/contents5_2.html#blackhole
>
> Best to you all,
> Sergey B. Karavashkin
>
> Head Laboratory SELF
> 187 apt., 38 bldg.
> Prospect Gagarina
> Kharkov 61140
> Ukraine
>
> Phone: +38 (057) 73706624
> e-mail: selftrans@yandex.ru , selflab@mail.ru
> http://www.angelfire.com/la3/SELFlab/index.html