"Tim Hammerquist" <tim@vegeta.ath.cx> wrote:
> Disaster graced us by uttering:
> > Actually this does not stem from my own
> > understanding of politics. It comes from my fathers who had several
> > things to say about your statements and the way you mostly used
> > totalitarian definitions as part of a government. He said it's an
> > economical status or something. Anyhow go talk to him!
>
> I'm not sure what you're referring to when you say "it's an economical
> status," but if you're referring to my definition of Libertarianism, I'm
> only repeating the contents of:

No the totalitarian thingy. Look I really don't know a lot in this area.
I'm only really responding to what my father said in passing. So just act
offended and leave it at that!

> > Russia exists because of it's government. the change of government
> > does not mean that it fell or has become former! Russia has borders
> > because there is a government there to declare them. otherwise it's
> > unclaimed territory.
>
> Since we seem to have gotten off track, let me reassert my point:
> Russia's former government was communist.  This is why I was reaffirming
> that I was talking about Russia's _government_, not it's _borders_.  I
> never said Russia _lacked_ a government, just that is lost one.  Subtle
> but important semantics.
>
> Yes, I argue semantics.  =)

*GRIN*
YEs, they are fun!
--
Carpe Jugulum
Disaster
Disaster's Fan Fiction - http://www.disfanfic.net
DSE - For the Public - http://www.disfanfic.net/DSE
JAE FAQ - http://www.evafaq.com
Pen^3's JAE FAQ - http://faq.pen3.cjb.net
Convention Reports - http://www.disfanfic.net/conventions