Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!news.yamada.gr.jp!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!kibo.news.demon.net!demon!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Rudolf Polzer Newsgroups: japan.anime.evangelion Subject: Re: Rei Ayanami Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:55:25 +0200 Organization: T-Online Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <20020721070724.07854.00000318@mb-mp.aol.com> Reply-To: ATField@durchnull.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1028052544 02 24824 0sYfb8bGTHArye 020730 18:09:04 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 520017359542-0001@t-dialin.net X-Homepage: http://www.durchnull.de X-PGP-Key: http://gpg.durchnull.ath.cx/key.txt User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org japan.anime.evangelion:1464 Scripsit illa aut ille Disaster : > You see this "Rudolf Polzer" wrote:" > that's what I am talking about! All of those in a post should be at the > top, never anywhere else unless used as an example like I have done here. > You always ensure that they always remain up there in the order in which > they should be. When someone top posts it means you gotta do a bit of copy > and pasting to get it done right. It can be a little tricky but it's > hardly anywhere near impossible to fix. This does not require you to > reorder them, yer right you never do that, but you do have to make sure > that all of the relevant ones are at the top as they are in this post. Then I would be forced to quote the whole posting as one piece until the precedessor's attribution line comes. That's not correct either. There is no correct quoting of top postings except completely snipping the quotation - this works as long as one is not referring to it. -- [mpg123d] Just playing: .../lopster/megumi/vintage/a/09 hesitation.mp3 Desweiteren fiel mir auf, das die Kommandozeile immer statt '?' ein Fragezeichen generierte. [Da_David in t-online.homepage.technik; OE hat mal wieder versagt]