Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!onodera-news!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Reply-To: "Anthony Giorgianni" From: "Anthony Giorgianni" Newsgroups: fj.comp.dev.digital-camera References: <2eVza.75911$_e6.53055@news2.east.cox.net> <5t5Aa.172030$ja4.8709536@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: Help on pics with blurry subjects Lines: 38 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 00:49:16 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.90.193.127 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1053910156 12.90.193.127 (Mon, 26 May 2003 00:49:16 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 00:49:16 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.comp.dev.digital-camera:29 I'm not sure I understand completely what you did. But flash certainly will allow a faster shutter speed, which will be more likely to stop motion. -- Regards, Anthony Giorgianni (I prefer that you reply by posting back to the newsgroup. If you must email: remove "killspam" from reply address. This email address will be valid for a short time only.) "fweddybear" wrote in message news:lM7Aa.79402$_e6.61014@news2.east.cox.net... > Anthony.... > > Here is something interesting.... i played a little with my shooting and > the new settings... first i got it so that my depth of field was good with > the still shots... (they really weren't all that bad to begin with)... then > with the motion shots... i had one of the kids wave his arm around... not > much better actually... but i found when i used a flash.... what a > difference... i mean it was perfect!!! I then for hahas set the camera back > to auto mode (turning the button to a/s/m) and shot without the flash.... > and with... without the flash gave me about the same result as in manual > mode.... and again a perfectly shot pic in auto mode... i guess the flash is > all i really needed....i never thought a flash would get rid of > blur.....does that sound funny to you?? (it does to me) plus i get a mmore > truer color in the pic...i just can't believe the difference!!! > > Fwed > >