Your future Society, civilised or corrupt, your choice

A CORRUPT FUTURE SOCIETY IS BEING IMPOSED ON US BY A MISUSE OF STATE POWER.
EXACT INFORMATION ON THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES INVOLVED, IS CAUSING SUPPORT
FOR THE CORRUPT ALTERNATIVE TO BE WITHDRAWN, MAKING IT NECESSARY TO USE
STATE POWER IN A CIVILISED MANNER, AND GIVING EVERY PERSON THE ABILITY TO
HELP TO CONTROL THEIR OWN FUTURE.

The problem is based on the use and allocations of public taxpayers money.
Successive governments have become over-concerned with the way the news
media are able to sway the pattern of votes at election time. The country's
finances have been increasingly tailored to favour the powerful business
interests in order to obtain their support at the future elections. The
national financial information shows a continuous year on year transfer of
public money away from the vulnerable lowest-income groups into the hands of
the most extreme upper-income and corporate sectors. Eventually these
upwards transfers of public money, driven by the powers of corporate greed,
have begun to inflict damage on the most vulnerable sectors of the Society.
The conflicts and stresses this is causing in the Society also damage the
quality of life for the wider body of the public. This is an illegal way to
run the country, contravening the fundamental laws of duty of care in the
use of public Office. Public actions to seek remedies have encountered the
deliberate use of State power to suppress the expressions of public
dissatisfactions. The use of State power to defend State activities that
inflict damage on the public, constitutes a criminal violation of these
basic laws.

The duties of public defence originate deep in our history, with common law
initially developing in the 1170s and later upgraded by Parliament and
locked in by the victory in the Civil War of the 1640s. The purpose of the
Norman invasion of 1066 had always been to take control of the wealth of
Britain by excessive taxation using any necessary degree of iron fist
pressures. This automatically created a continuous public hostility making
it necessary for the Normans to employ the full weight of their armies to
enforce their exploitations.

In the 1170s the then-King (Henry II) was faced with an emergency when a
foreign army began to invade the province of Aquitaine, part of his French
possessions, making it essential to release the forces pinned down by the
hostility of the English. As the lesser of two evils. Henry agreed to be
bound by a rule of law imposing specific limitations on the use of State
power. This code of basic law has come down to the present days as the
common law that forms the foundations of criminal law such as murder and
conspiracy and also defines the duties of care required from every State
official. After the 1170s, once the immediate danger had passed, a
continuous campaign of distortions and evasions has tried to suppress the
information on the full degree of the public's powers against their
governments by the use of Law.

By the 1620s the powers of law enforcement had weakened to a sufficient
extent to allow a new period of excessive financial abuses to be imposed
under a system of Divine Right government. This aroused the level of public
hostility that brought about the reinforcing of the common law duties by new
Statutory powers, shortly afterwards endorsed by the victory in the
Parliamentary Civil Wars. The main financial abuses that Parliament brought
to an end are set out in the Statutes of the early 1640s, the 16C1 series,
public documents available to anybody who chooses to look. In addition, one
of these Statutes blames the judges for allowing the Divine Right tyranny
and exploitation to take place. The Act Abolishing Star Chamber, 17C1c10 of
1641, opens by setting out in full detail the sources of judge power, and
goes on to say " but the judges have not kept themselves to the points
limited by the said Statutes, but
have undertaken to punish where no law doth warrant, and to make decrees for
things having no such authority, and to inflict heavier punishments than by
any law is warranted, ... and their proceedings censures and decrees have
been the means to introduce an arbitrary power and government .. for
settling whereof and preventing the like in time to come Parliament imposed
a massive fine equivalent to about