Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:

>> Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>> > mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>>
>> >> > And how can OJ's guilt or lack of it be sensed now?
>> >>
>> >> Maybe the civil court case has some small bearing.
>>
>> > Does his legal status cause him to give off bad vibes that it not
>> > be "metaphysical"?
>>
>> Sorry, I can't even pretend to know what you're talking about here.

> If you claim not to be involved in the argument about "metaphysical"

I responded to your statements about OJ. You are incorrect when you
state he was not found to be responsible for the deaths of two people.

Get it? Nothing metaphysical; you're just wrong.

>> > What about people who do not know who OJ is, or who do not
>> > recognize him in public? Can they sense he lost a civil suit and
>> > avoided conviction as well?
>>
>> Again, this doesn't even make bad sense.

> Tell it to posters who do admit to arguing about "metaphysical" guilt

I'm talking to you; if I wanted to discuss this metaphysical nonsense
with them, I would.

Really, this isn't all that complicated.

Mike