Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:

>> >> "Help! I've been robbed!"
>> >> "Shut up, mister! You haven't been robbed until there has been due
>> >> process and an verdict of guilt!"
>>
>> > Finally. Someone else on the group who is willing to stand up for this truth. A
>>
>> You mean, a lawyer can't be expected to understand the verdict would
>> indicate a guilty party, and not the existance of a crime?

> Try to recall years of prior attempts at exchange on law or crime on this group,

Uh, I think I can manage that.

> even on threads involving you and myself. I cannot find the relevant post through
> Google, but that "A certain someone" refers to you personally.

Sorry, that doesn't parse properly...

> A statistically
> uncommon trial and an unlikely guilty verdict

What is a "statistically uncommon trial"?

> are not necessary to prove something
> took place.

Uh, right. 

Then why did you disagree above?

Mike