necoandjeff <spam@schrepfer.com> wrote:
> <mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net> wrote in message

>> http://www.allegromedia.com/sugi/taxes/#Head-3.htm
>>
>> Both use the term "tax burden" to describe the %age of the Federal Taxes
>> for each income category, adding up to 100%.
>>
>> Care to try again?

> Interesting, how can something that adds up to 100% all the time be falling?

Sorry, it's still 100%; it can be smaller or larger in actual amount,
but it's STILL 100%

> Perhaps you would like to try again...

The fact that you don't like the term doesn't mean it's misused.

Mike