Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
> in article calmvr$js6$2@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/15/04 11:30 AM:

>>> thing that has changed is how flat that graduated tax is.
>> 
>> Which was rather the point; it flattened it, not simply reduced it down
>> the line.

> And why is flattening it not a good thing?

I actually don't recall placing a value judgement on it.

Could you find that post for me, please?

I DO recall saying that the very rich benefit disproportionately from
government services, but that's not quite the same thing, is it, Mr
Schaal?

Mike